
By adding magnetite into a set of simulation experiments, a closer fit to the observed solubility characteristics in the tank was obtained. As the pH drops from its starting alkaline value as dissolved, atmospheric CO2 acidifies the liquor in the sludge tank, there is a concomitant impact on the equilibrium position of the liquid versus solid phase of Brucite in the waste mixture. It seems to me that since this is an accepted outcome of the plant configuration (ie aeration cannot be conveniently contained), the model requires incorporation of the multiple pH dependent events that will collectively determine the distribution of ionised Brucite in its dissolved and precipitated phases in the mixture. It was good to hear that Alex and his colleagues are now developing more sophisticated models in order to address such issues.
As is the norm at the Widnes SciBar, the audience contained a sprinkling of seasoned veterans of the nuclear industry, who shared some of their fundamental knowledge and experience, which added colour to the talk. Alex also fielded several questions about the value of modelling, the time and computing power needed, and Bob invited Alex to comment on the future challenges and opportunities for Nuclear Power. There were also some detailed questions about gaseous waste issues, the replacement of Magnesium casing with Zirconium and several more general questions about site access and visitors. Bob, it might be an opportunity for a SciBar coach trip! In the absence of an immediate trip, "Britain’s Nuclear Secrets – Inside Sellafield" with Jim Al-Khalili which was on the BBC last year., isn't currently available via the BBC, but it is here:- www.dailymotion.com/video/
Thanks again to Alex and all those who attended: another full house at the Hillcrest Hotel. The next talk will be announced by Bob, and looks at the future of technology through the eyes of Star Trek's creator, Gene Rodenberry! And I leave below a link for those wishing to swell the ranks of the British Science Association. Personally, why wouldn't you!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteTry again ...
ReplyDeleteI understand why empirical curve fitting might raise an eyebrow, but having been a recent bystander to modelling the Quasi-biennial Oscillation (QBO) with Eureqa I'm sure there are insights that could not be arrived at in any other way. Likewise, watching mathematicians approaching reaction kinetics via networks and category theory can be frustrating, but I have to concede that they gain insights denied to a more traditional biochemical training.
Indeed! Still stuck in my traditional ways! The modellers of reaction pathways in enzyme catalysis in the 1960s (in France, Monod, Wyman and Changeux and in the USA, Koshland, Nemethy and Filmer) all left a poor kinetics legacy. However Archibald Vivian Hill's simple model for the dissociation of oxygen from haemoglobin is the result of empirical curve fitting and has not really been surpassed for analysing regulated enzyme kinetics in over 100 years!
ReplyDelete